They also update there anti-cheat quite often.

The only real deference's is that ESEA has never been semi-decompiled (unlike faceit) therefore its a lot harder to bypass. I feel like you over estimate FACEIT, when comparing it to ESEA its not super super difficult, if anything its a little bit less of a challenge than ESEA.ĮSEA does screengrabs so does FACEIT (both also use BitBlt)ĮSEA connects with a serverside anti-cheat so does FACEITĮSEA scans memory so does FACEIT (maybe idk im talking about the 2016 version that was cracked or leaked or whatever)ĮSEA bans people for bad programs so does FACEITĮSEA admins watch your screen if your high up and have a lot of reports so does FACEITĮSEA bans are instant so is FACEIT (i think, i really hope that there ss anti cheat detected my paste rage and my game didn't just crash) They also put much more work into adding as many detection vectors as they can because their. Things like mismatched mouse deltas and tickcount manipulation (i.e. Faceit Anti-cheat client and ESEA client are both 'better' than vac because they introduce many more detection vectors since they have access to the kernel and can detect driver operations, which are inaccessible to vac since it's a usermode anticheat. CSGO Faceit Aimbot: > Requirements > ID Verification or you must have.

It checks everything it can to determine if you are cheating, far more than Valve servers do. We are one of the few who support such anti-cheats as ESEA for CS:GO and Riot. Bypassing FACEIT client is pretty damn difficult, in my opinion, it's one of the best anticheats out there.įACEIT server anticheat is, well, just server-side.

Faceit anti cheat vs esea